|
G. Expert
Witness List
Here is the list of all experts presented by both State and
defense. Eleven experts from the State and two experts from the
defense came to testify in court. As you see just from the number
of experts represented by each side, the State had much greater
resources to hire experts than the defense. Having resources
can greatly affect the outcome of the litigation. Regardless
of the disparity in financial resources, the defense team did
well to obtain impressive results from this litigation. A healthy
sense of outrage on behalf of our clients, together with the
confidence in my winning case strategy made the fight better
than even up.
(State Experts)
| Name |
Affiliation |
| Edward P. Conde |
U.S. Department of Transportation
Volpe National Transportation Systems
Center |
| Samuel E. Chappell, Ph.D. |
Consultant
(previously employed by National Institute for Standards and Technology)
|
| Barry K. Logan, Ph.D. |
Washington State Police |
| Rod G. Gullberg |
Washington State Police |
| J. Robert Zettl |
Consultant
(previously employed by Colorado State Police)
|
| Stephen B. Seidman, Ph.D. |
University of Central Arkansas |
| Hansueli Ryser |
Dräeger |
| Patrick M. Harding |
Wisconsin State Police |
| Norman J. Dee |
The CMX Group |
| Thomas A. Brettell, Ph.D. |
New Jersey State Police |
| Sgt. Kevin M. Flanagan |
New Jersey State Police |
(Defense Experts)
| Name |
Affiliation |
| Gerald Simpson, Ph.D. |
N/A |
| Michael Peter Hlastala, Ph.D. |
University of Washington |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1The figure is as
of May 29, 2007. Win rate is defined as the number of clients
not convicted for DWI divided by the total number of clients
who were charged with DWI. The clients are those who retained
this office after 2005. Each case varies. Under any circumstance,
we do NOT guarantee a successful outcome in any individual case.
2The
figure is as of May 29, 2007. Win rate is defined as the number
of clients not convicted for No Automobile Liability Insurance
divided by the total number of clients who were charged with
said charge. The clients are those who retained this office after
2000. Each case varies. Under any circumstance, we do NOT guarantee
a successful outcome in any individual case.
|
