State v. Chun

Name:


Phone No.:


Case:


Email:


Enter the number given below:

State v. Chun, et al.: New Jersey Supreme Court DWI Case

One way to be a smart consumer is to educate yourself about services that you are receiving. This is true for legal services including drunk driving defense. Do you know that only seven DWI defense attorneys in the entire State of New Jersey, including myself, are fighting for all New Jersey drivers in the New Jersey Supreme Court? This is the most important DWI Supreme Court Case in NJ in the last 17 years. I created the defense strategy for this litigation. This issue in the case is to compel the State to produce evidence to support New Jersey’s claim that the new alcohol detection machine is scientifically reliable. If you were tested on this new machine and were convicted, you have the right to have your case reviewed. Contact this office about any DWI case. Unless there is a compelling reason, I do not plead my clients guilty. Even though you were already convicted with the new machine, there may be something I can do because you are affected by this litigation. See Convicted? How To Reverse It (Developer: Please link to IV. Convicted? How to Reverse It) if you would like to find out your options. As an attorney who is actively involved in this Supreme Court DWI case, I am proud to tell you more about this litigation and possible options for you.

A.	“Chun” Litigation As A Landmark of New Jersey Law
B.	I Created The Strategy For The Defense Team
C.	Alcotest 7110 Evidence Is Defensible
D.	Do Not Give Up On An Alcotest 7110 Case
E.	If You Already Entered “Conditional Plea”
F.	Inside Stories Of “Chun” Litigation
G.	Expert Witness List
H.	Findings from “Chun”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
¹The figure is as of May 29, 2007. Win rate is defined as the number of clients not convicted for DWI divided by the total number of clients who were charged with DWI. The clients are those who retained this office after 2005. Each case varies. Under any circumstance, we do NOT guarantee a successful outcome in any individual case.

²The figure is as of May 29, 2007. Win rate is defined as the number of clients not convicted for No Automobile Liability Insurance divided by the total number of clients who were charged with said charge. The clients are those who retained this office after 2000. Each case varies. Under any circumstance, we do NOT guarantee a successful outcome in any individual case.